The Enigma of Angkor


Angkor, the lost kingdom, has long been a source of fascination and intrigue. In the midst of medieval Europe's cathedral constructions, the Khmers were busy erecting Angkor on the other side of the world. This sprawling complex of temples, pagodas, and palaces, hidden within the Cambodian jungle, has puzzled historians for centuries.

In 1861, French naturalist Henri Mouhot stumbled upon Angkor during his exploration of Cambodia. The sight of immense stone structures, including the iconic Angkor Wat, left him awestruck. The Khmer Empire, once spanning from the South China Sea to the Gulf of Siam, was a beacon of civilization in Southeast Asia. Its grandeur was epitomized by Angkor Wat, a colossal temple complex constructed by King Suryavarman II in the 12th century.

The 20th century saw efforts to rescue Angkor from the jungle's grip. French scholars, led by Bernard Groslier, undertook the painstaking task of dismantling and reconstructing the monuments to preserve them from erosion and a mysterious 'stone disease.' These restoration efforts unveiled the Khmer Empire's remarkable achievements in hydraulic engineering, agriculture, and military prowess. The Khmers' sophisticated society flourished amidst luxury, though it was built on the backs of many slaves.

The empire's decline remains a mystery. In 1431, the Siamese invaders plundered Angkor, leading to various theories about the Khmers' disappearance. Some speculate war fatigue, others a devastating plague, or even a slave revolt. Regardless, the truth behind the Khmers' vanishing act eludes historians, shrouding Angkor's legacy in an enduring enigma. Today, as Angkor undergoes meticulous restoration, it stands as a testament to the lost civilization, leaving visitors and scholars alike captivated by its ancient mysteries.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Totems, Broken Men, and the Roots of Untouchability: An Anthropological Reflection on Ambedkar’s Insights

Image
The study of totems in India, unlike in many other anthropological traditions, has long been neglected. This neglect owes much to a dominant perspective advanced by colonial administrators, notably the Census Commissioner, who insisted that the fundamental unit of Hindu social organization was the sub-caste, bound by endogamy. Yet, as Dr. B. R. Ambedkar sharply pointed out, nothing could be further from the truth. For him, the real unit of Hindu society was not the sub-caste but the family, governed not by endogamy but by exogamy. In this sense, the Hindu family is essentially tribal in its organization. In northern India especially, marriage rules are shaped by kula and gotra, which operate as equivalents of the totemic system in so-called “primitive” societies. Caste and sub-caste, Ambedkar argued, were superimposed later, as secondary layers of social order. Beneath them lay the older tribal system, still visible in the exogamous rules that structured kinship and family life. Tribes...
Read more

When Aryans Met Dravidians: A Clash of Curries and Castes

Image
  Introduction The term Dravidian is commonly used to refer to all of the non-Aryan population in the peninsula of India. The Dravidians are considered to be the aboriginal inhabitants of the land. They predominate in the southern and eastern parts of India but form a considerable part of the population in the northwestern part where the Aryans predominate. Lost in Antiquity The history of the Dravidians is lost in antiquity. Long before the Aryans came to India, they were the domiciled inhabitants. They have preserved no literature and left no monuments that throw light upon their origin. Theories of Dravidian Origin There are two main theories with regard to the origin of the Dravidians in India. The one most commonly accepted is that they came through the northwest passages in the Himalaya Mountains at some time far earlier than the Aryan invasion. The physiognomy of the Dravidians is very similar to that of the Caucasians, and has but little resemblance to the Mongolians. Moreo...
Read more

No Devadasis in God’s Own Country

Image
Introduction      The Devadasi system, which flourished in Tamil Nadu and Orissa, has no substantial evidence of ever existing in Kerala. Kavalam Narayana Panikkar emphasizes that there are no indigenous families or records claiming such a tradition in Kerala’s temples. Elamkulam Kunjan Pillai speculated that women might have been employed in Kerala’s temples as Devadasis, basing his arguments on inscriptions found in Tamil Nadu temples such as Suchindram, Cholapuram, and Kanchipuram. Yet, as Panikkar notes, these claims remain conjectural and are strongly challenged by other historians who argue that the absence of any lingering Devadasi families in Kerala undermines such theories (Pillai 1978: 278–281). Koothachi and the Artistic Communities      Confusion often arises due to the term koothachi, mistakenly equated with Devadasi. In Kerala, koothachi referred to women performers of the Chakyar 1 community, whose art—Koothu—was a respected theatrical tra...
Read more